Saudi CMA Green & Sustainability Debt: Issuer Disclosure Rules

Saudi CMA Green, Social & Sustainability-Linked Debt: What Issuers Must Disclose

Most Saudi debt teams read the Capital Market Authority's green finance rules once, filed them under guidance, and moved on. That was a mistake. The Saudi CMA green, social and sustainability debt guidelines disclosure regime that took effect in 2025 is voluntary in name and mandatory in effect: the moment an issuer attaches a green, social, sustainability or sustainability-linked label to Saudi riyal debt, a specific set of disclosures stops being optional.

Spectreco, an ESG technology and advisory firm with offices in Atlanta, London, Lisbon and Lahore, advises issuers and arrangers across the Gulf on exactly this gap. This article sets out what the CMA requires labelled-debt issuers to disclose, how those obligations sit alongside Saudi Arabia's still-voluntary broader ESG reporting trajectory, and where the money is already moving under Vision 2030. If you are preparing an issuance for Tadawul, the disclosure file is now part of the deal, not an afterthought to it.

What Are the Saudi CMA GSS/SLB Guidelines?

The Guidelines for Issuing Green, Social, Sustainability and Sustainability-Linked Debt Instruments are a CMA framework, effective 27 May 2025, that defines four labelled debt categories and requires issuers using those labels to disclose alignment, external review and impact. The guidance is non-binding, but disclosure of any non-compliance is mandatory.

The CMA's board approved the framework as a deliverable under its 2024-2026 Strategic Plan, tied to the Financial Sector Development Program under Vision 2030. GSS refers to green, social and sustainability instruments, where proceeds are ring-fenced for eligible projects. SLB refers to sustainability-linked bonds, a structure where the coupon or terms shift depending on whether the issuer hits pre-agreed sustainability targets. The guidelines draw directly on the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) principles that govern these instruments globally.

Sources: CMA, Guidelines Announcement (May 2025), Arab News

This is the debt-market counterpart to the wider Saudi reporting picture. For the listed-company reporting trajectory, see Spectreco's guide to Saudi Arabia ISSB reporting for Tadawul companies. For the Islamic-finance mechanics of labelled sukuk, see the companion piece on green sukuk and ESG disclosure in the GCC.

What the CMA Guidelines Require Issuers to Disclose

The CMA anchors its disclosure expectations to the ICMA Green Bond Principles, Social Bond Principles, Sustainability Bond Guidelines and Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles. Four disclosure obligations matter most to a Saudi issuer.

1. A Framework Document Setting Out Use of Proceeds

Before issuance, the issuer publishes a framework describing the instrument, the eligible green or social projects, and how the structure aligns with the relevant ICMA principles. For GSS instruments, proceeds must be used exclusively to finance or refinance eligible projects. Use of proceeds is the entire basis of the label. The ICMA structure the CMA points to rests on four components: use of proceeds, project evaluation and selection, management of proceeds, and reporting.

Sources: CMA Guidelines (full text, PDF), Sustainalytics, Green Bond Principles explained

2. An External Reviewer Report, Public on Tadawul

For a public offering of green, social or sustainability debt, the issuer must publish an external reviewer's report, typically a second-party opinion, an independent assessment confirming the framework aligns with the applicable principles. The report has to be available before or at the same time as the prospectus, and it must stay publicly available on Tadawul's website for the full term of the instrument. This is the disclosure that turns a marketing claim into a verifiable one.

Sources: CMA Guidelines (full text, PDF)

3. Post-Issuance Allocation and Impact Reporting

After issuance, the issuer must provide post-issuance reports summarising the funded projects, the amounts allocated from proceeds, and their environmental or social impact, and for a public offering must publish those reports on Tadawul. Allocation reporting confirms where the money went. Impact reporting quantifies what it achieved, in tonnes of CO2 equivalent avoided, megawatts of renewable capacity installed, or cubic metres of water treated. Weak impact reporting is where GCC issuers most often lose credibility with international investors.

Sources: CMA Guidelines (full text, PDF)

4. For SLBs: KPIs and Ambitious Sustainability Targets

Sustainability-linked instruments are different. Proceeds fund general corporate purposes, so the label rides entirely on performance. The issuer must select key performance indicators and set sustainability performance targets that are ambitious, that go beyond a business-as-usual trajectory, and that are fixed on a predefined timeline set before or at issuance. Vague or soft targets defeat the structure and invite exactly the greenwashing scrutiny the framework exists to prevent.

Sources: CMA Guidelines (full text, PDF), Gulf Business

Mandatory for Issuers, Voluntary Everywhere Else

Here is the nuance that trips up boards. The CMA describes the guidelines as guiding in nature, and Saudi Arabia has no economy-wide mandatory ESG reporting rule. Broad ESG disclosure for Tadawul-listed companies still runs on voluntary CMA guidance from 2019 and the Saudi Exchange's 2021 ESG framework aligned to GRI and SASB indicators.

The labelled-debt rules cut across that voluntary baseline. Any issuer of green, social, sustainable or sustainability-linked debt denominated in Saudi riyals, offered through public or private placement, must disclose any instance of non-compliance with the guidelines in the framework document or offering documents. You do not have to issue labelled debt. Once you do, the disclosure is not a choice.

Sources: CMA, Guidelines Announcement (May 2025), STA-Terra, ESG Disclosure in KSA

That structure sits on a clear trajectory. The Society of Certified Public Accountants has reviewed IFRS S1 and IFRS S2, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) climate and sustainability standards, and both the CMA and Tadawul have signalled ISSB and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) alignment as the expected direction. No economy-wide adoption date is confirmed. The labelled-debt regime is the first place that expectation became a hard filing requirement, and issuers that build the disclosure muscle now will not face a scramble when broader rules land.

Sources: STA-Terra, ESG Disclosure in KSA, Anthesis, Mandatory Reporting in the Middle East

The contrast with the UAE is instructive. UAE federal climate law already makes Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions reporting a legal obligation with financial penalties. Saudi Arabia is running an earlier stage of the same sequence. Spectreco's analysis of the UAE 30 May 2026 GHG reporting deadline sets out where that road leads.

Vision 2030 and the Money Already Moving

This is not a market waiting to form. Green sukuk issuance across the Middle East reached USD 11.4 billion in 2025, up from USD 7.9 billion in 2024, with sustainable sukuk now more than 45 percent of the region's sustainable bond activity, according to S&P Global. Saudi and UAE issuers alone accounted for 68 percent of ESG sukuk volume through the first nine months of 2025.

Sources: Oren / S&P Global and Zawya data

Saudi issuers are already living inside the disclosure model the CMA has now codified:

• Saudi Electricity Company priced a USD 2.75 billion dual-tranche sukuk in February 2025, with a USD 1.25 billion green tranche funding eligible projects under its Green Sukuk Framework. It has raised USD 3.75 billion in green sukuk since 2020 and targets net zero by 2050.

• Saudi National Bank issued an USD 850 million sustainable sukuk under its Sustainable Finance Framework, oversubscribed 4.8 times, with roughly 60 percent placed to global investors including dedicated ESG funds.

• The Government of Saudi Arabia issued a sovereign green bond in March 2025 under its 2024 Green Financing Framework, with a post-issuance second-party opinion from Moody's and an allocation report published in March 2026.

Sources: DDCAP, SEC sukuk, Saudi National Bank, NDMC, sovereign green bond SPO

Every one of those transactions relied on a published framework, an external opinion and an allocation report. The CMA has taken what leading issuers were already doing by market convention and turned it into a disclosure baseline for anyone using the label. For issuers earlier in that journey, the Public Investment Fund's Green Finance Framework and its DNV second-party opinion remain a useful reference point for structure. Saudi green bond and sukuk issuance had already grown from roughly USD 1 billion in 2019 to around USD 8 billion by 2023, and the CMA framework is built to widen that channel further.

Sources: Ghazzawi Law Firm, Saudi ESG board readiness

How Saudi Issuers Should Prepare

Five steps close the gap between intent to issue and a credible, compliant issuance file.

1. Build the framework first. Draft a green, social, sustainability or sustainability-linked framework that maps use of proceeds, project selection and proceeds management to the relevant ICMA principles before you approach the market.

2. Line up an external reviewer early. Second-party opinions take time. Engage a provider with Islamic finance literacy so the ESG opinion and the Shariah board view do not contradict each other in due diligence.

3. Stand up impact data before issuance, not after. Retrofitting emissions and impact measurement after the deal produces reports investors do not trust. Design the data collection while the framework is being written.

4. For SLBs, pressure-test your targets. Confirm the KPIs are material and the sustainability performance targets are genuinely beyond business as usual, with a fixed timeline. Soft targets are a reputational liability.

5. Plan for the reporting term, not the launch. The external review must stay public on Tadawul for the life of the instrument, and allocation and impact reports recur annually. Treat disclosure as a multi-year obligation with an owner, not a one-off document.

This is the layer Spectreco builds for issuers. The AI-driven ESG platform handles multi-jurisdictional emissions tracking, allocation and impact reporting so post-issuance disclosure is continuous rather than reconstructed each year, while the Virtual Sustainability Office keeps the obligation current as CMA expectations tighten.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

‍

Preparing a Labelled Issuance for Tadawul?

The disclosure file is now part of the deal. Spectreco's GCC Climate and Green Finance advisory team helps sovereign, bank and corporate issuers build ICMA-aligned frameworks, coordinate second-party opinions, and stand up the allocation and impact reporting the CMA expects on Tadawul. For the reporting-systems side, our ESG reporting and disclosure advisory designs the data infrastructure behind a credible issuance.

Talk to the Spectreco GCC team about a green finance disclosure readiness review before your next issuance.

‍